Estimated glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice: Consensus positioning of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (SBN) and Brazilian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (SBPC/ML).

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents one of today's main public health problems. Serum creatinine measurement and estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are the main tools for evaluating renal function. There are several equations to estimate GFR, and CKD-EPI equation (Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology) is the most recommended one. There are still some controversies regarding serum creatinine measurement and GFR estimation, since several factors can interfere in this process. An important recent change was the removal of the correction for race from the equations for estimating GFR, which overestimated kidney function, and consequently delayed the implementation of treatments such as dialysis and kidney transplantation. In this consensus document from the Brazilian Societies of Nephrology and Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, the main concepts related to the assessment of renal function are reviewed, as well as possible existing controversies and recommendations for estimating GFR in clinical practice.

The viral etiology of EBV-associated gastric cancers contributes to their unique pathology, clinical outcomes, treatment responses and immune landscape.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a pathogen known to cause a number of malignancies, often taking years for them to develop after primary infection. EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is one such malignancy, and is an immunologically, molecularly and pathologically distinct entity from EBV-negative gastric cancer (EBVnGC). In comparison with EBVnGCs, EBVaGCs overexpress a number of immune regulatory genes to help form an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), have improved prognosis, and overall have an "immune-hot" phenotype. This review provides an overview of the histopathology, clinical features and clinical outcomes of EBVaGCs. We also summarize the differences between the TMEs of EBVaGCs and EBVnGCs, which includes significant differences in cell composition and immune infiltration. A list of available EBVaGC and EBVnGC gene expression datasets and computational tools are also provided within this review. Finally, an overview is provided of the various chemo- and immuno-therapeutics available in treating gastric cancers (GCs), with a focus on EBVaGCs.

Histopathologic evaluation of gastric intestinal metaplasia in non-neoplastic biopsy specimens: Accuracy and interobserver reliability among general pathologists and pathology residents.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver reliability of diagnosing and subtyping gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) among general pathologists and pathology residents at a university hospital in Thailand, focusing on the challenges in the histopathologic evaluation of gastric IM for less experienced practitioners. METHODS: The study analyzed 44 non-neoplastic gastric biopsies, using a consensus diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathologists as the reference standard. Participants included 6 general pathologists and 9 pathology residents who assessed gastric IM and categorized its subtype (complete, incomplete, or mixed) on digital slides. After initial evaluations and receiving feedback, participants reviewed specific images of gastric IM, as agreed by experts. Following a one-month washout period, a reevaluation of the slides was conducted. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver reliability, and time taken for diagnosis improved following training, with general pathologists showing higher accuracies than residents (median accuracy of gastric IM detection: 100 % vs. 97.7 %). Increased years of experience were associated with more IM detection accuracy (p-value<0.05). However, the overall median accuracy for diagnosing incomplete IM remained lower than for complete IM (86.4 % vs. 97.7 %). After training, diagnostic errors occurred in 6 out of 44 specimens (13.6 %), reported by over 40 % of participants. Errors involved omitting 5 slides with incomplete IM and 1 with complete IM, all showing a subtle presence of IM. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the diagnostic challenges in identifying incomplete gastric IM, showing notable discrepancies in accuracy and interobserver agreement. It underscores the need for better diagnostic protocols and training to enhance detection and management outcomes.

Digital pathology for reporting histopathology samples, including cancer screening samples - definitive evidence from a multisite study.

AIMS: To conduct a definitive multicentre comparison of digital pathology (DP) with light microscopy (LM) for reporting histopathology slides including breast and bowel cancer screening samples. METHODS: A total of 2024 cases (608 breast, 607 GI, 609 skin, 200 renal) were studied, including 207 breast and 250 bowel cancer screening samples. Cases were examined by four pathologists (16 study pathologists across the four speciality groups), using both LM and DP, with the order randomly assigned and 6 weeks between viewings. Reports were compared for clinical management concordance (CMC), meaning identical diagnoses plus differences which do not affect patient management. Percentage CMCs were computed using logistic regression models with crossed random-effects terms for case and pathologist. The obtained percentage CMCs were referenced to 98.3% calculated from previous studies. RESULTS: For all cases LM versus DP comparisons showed the CMC rates were 99.95% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 99.90-99.97] and 98.96 (95% CI = 98.42-99.32) for cancer screening samples. In speciality groups CMC for LM versus DP showed: breast 99.40% (99.06-99.62) overall and 96.27% (94.63-97.43) for cancer screening samples; [gastrointestinal (GI) = 99.96% (99.89-99.99)] overall and 99.93% (99.68-99.98) for bowel cancer screening samples; skin 99.99% (99.92-100.0); renal 99.99% (99.57-100.0). Analysis of clinically significant differences revealed discrepancies in areas where interobserver variability is known to be high, in reads performed with both modalities and without apparent trends to either. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing LM and DP CMC, overall rates exceed the reference 98.3%, providing compelling evidence that pathologists provide equivalent results for both routine and cancer screening samples irrespective of the modality used.

Navigating the path to precision: ChatGPT as a tool in pathology.

In recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into medicine has marked a transformative shift in healthcare practices. This study explores the application of ChatGPT 3.5, an AI-based natural language processing model, in the field of pathology, with a focus on Clinical Pathology, Histopathology, and Hematology. Leveraging a dataset of 30 clinical cases from an online source, the model's performance was evaluated, revealing moderate proficiency in data analysis and decision support. While ChatGPT demonstrated strengths in swift narrative comprehension and foundational insights, limitations were observed in generating detailed and comprehensive information. The study emphasizes the evolving nature of AI in pathology, highlighting the need for ongoing refinement and collaborative efforts between AI researchers and healthcare professionals.

[Clinicopathological diagnosis of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: Report of three cases]. / Diagnóstico clínico-patológico de la neoplasia de células dendríticas plasmocitoides blásticas: reporte de 3 casos.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. It frequently affects the skin; indeed, dermal lesions may be the first clinical manifestation. We report three cases of BPDCN where the patients presented with skin lesions and describe the clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, its molecular characteristics and metastatic work-up. One of the patients remains in a clinical trial with IMGN632, a molecule directed against CD123, while the other two patients died after different therapeutic regimens. BPDCN is a complex diagnostic challenge which, together with its poor prognosis, requires close clinical-pathological cooperation in order to accelerate its diagnosis and offer early therapeutic alternatives with drugs directed against specific molecular targets.

Mesothelioma in the pleura, pericardium and peritoneum: Recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

AIMS: Mesothelioma is a rare malignancy of the serosal membranes that is commonly related to exposure to asbestos. Despite extensive research and clinical trials, prognosis to date remains poor. Consistent, comprehensive and reproducible pathology reporting form the basis of all future interventions for an individual patient, but also ensures that meaningful data are collected to identify predictive and prognostic markers. METHODS AND RESULTS: This article details the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) process and the development of the international consensus mesothelioma reporting data set. It describes the 'core' and 'non-core' elements to be included in pathology reports for mesothelioma of all sites, inclusive of clinical, macroscopic, microscopic and ancillary testing considerations. An international expert panel consisting of pathologists and a medical oncologist produced a set of data items for biopsy and resection specimens based on a critical review and discussion of current evidence, and in light of the changes in the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumours. The commentary focuses particularly upon new entities such as mesothelioma in situ and provides background on relevant and essential ancillary testing as well as implementation of the new requirement for tumour grading. CONCLUSION: We recommend widespread and consistent implementation of this data set, which will facilitate accurate reporting and enhance the consistency of data collection, improve the comparison of epidemiological data, support retrospective research and ultimately help to improve clinical outcomes. To this end, all data sets are freely available worldwide on the ICCR website (www.iccr-cancer.org/data-sets).

Comparing the Pathology, Clinical, and Demographic Characteristics of Younger and Older-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Older people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a less active radiological and clinical presentation, but many still attain significant levels of disability; but what drives worsening disability in this group? METHODS: We used data from the UK MS Register to characterize demographics and clinical features of late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS; symptom onset at ≥50 years), compared with adult-onset MS (AOMS; onset 18-49 years). We performed a pathology study of a separate MS cohort with a later onset (n = 18, mean age of onset 54 years) versus AOMS (n = 23, mean age of onset 29 years). RESULTS: In the Register cohort, there were 1,608 (9.4%) with LOMS. When compared with AOMS, there was a lower proportion of women, a higher proportion of primary progressive MS, a higher level of disability at diagnosis (median MS impact scale 36.7 vs. 28.3, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of gait-related initial symptoms. People with LOMS were less likely to receive a high efficacy disease-modifying treatment and attained substantial disability sooner. Controlling for age of death and sex, neuron density in the thalamus and pons decreased with onset-age, whereas actively demyelinating lesions and compartmentalized inflammation was greatest in AOMS. Only neuron density, and not demyelination or the extent of compartmentalized inflammation, correlated with disability outcomes in older-onset MS patients. INTERPRETATION: The more progressive nature of older-onset MS is associated with significant neurodegeneration, but infrequent inflammatory demyelination. These findings have implications for the assessment and treatment of MS in older people. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:471-486.

The American Society for Clinical Pathology 2022 Vacancy Survey of medical laboratories in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent and distribution of laboratory workforce shortages within the nation's medical laboratories. METHODS: The Vacancy Survey was conducted through collaboration between the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy in Washington, DC, and the Evaluation, Measurement, and Assessment Department and ASCP Board of Certification in Chicago, IL. Data were collected through an internet survey distributed to individuals who were able to report on staffing and certifications for their laboratories. RESULTS: Results of the ASCP 2022 Vacancy Survey show increased overall vacancy rates for laboratory positions in all departments compared with 2020. Overall retirement rates for laboratory professionals increased across most departments. CONCLUSIONS: Current Vacancy Survey data show continued increases in the numbers of laboratory vacancies and retirements as well as changes in certification requirements, with trends amplified during the pandemic continuing into the present. Qualitative analysis results showed that there is an urgent need to focus not only on recruitment but-equally important-on retention of laboratory professionals.

Preferences of clinical pathologists for probability-modifying terms describing cytologic sample evaluations: A survey study.

BACKGROUND: A recent study identified 7 probability ranges used by clinical pathologists and associated qualitative terms used in cytology reports. Clinicians and clinical pathologists agreed that limiting the number of terms could help enhance communication between clinical pathologists and clinicians. However, the preferred terms for each range remain undetermined. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine a single term for each probability range that could be adopted by the global veterinary clinical pathology community. METHOD: Clinical pathologists responded to a survey invitation distributed via the specialty listserv. Clinical pathologists were asked to rank previously identified terms for each probability range from "most preferred" to "least preferred." An alternative term could be proposed if they preferred a term not included in the question. The preferences were summed by rank. Where first choice ranks were within 20% of each other, the 1st and 2nd choices were added. The term with the highest counts was chosen to represent the probability range. RESULTS: The highest-ranking terms corresponding to the probability ranges of 0%-20%, 20%-50%, 50%-65%, 65%-75%, 75%-85%, 85%-95%, and 95%-100% were "no evidence for," "cannot rule out," "possible," "suspicious for," "most likely," "most consistent with," and no modifier, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have sampled clinical pathologists across the globe to rank terms in cytology reports associated with previously identified probability ranges to identify single qualitative terms for which there was the most agreement between clinicians and clinical pathologists. Our study provides the foundation for standardizing and limiting probability-modifying terms to improve communication with clinicians.

A review of Bland-Altman difference plot analysis in the veterinary clinical pathology laboratory.

Current guidelines recommend using Bland-Altman plots (BA-plots), also called Difference plots, as part of method comparison evaluation in the veterinary clinical pathology laboratory. Analysis of differences can meaningfully augment linear regression techniques and allows fuller summarization of the performance of two methods relative to each other. This work summarizes the current literature on BA-plot composition and evaluation. Model data is used to demonstrate data evaluation approaches based on the observed differences, the combined inherent imprecision of the methods, and clinically relevant performance goals. Common limitations of the approaches, including points of frequent misinterpretation, are presented. BA-plot analysis can be part of an intentionally crafted method comparison study that provides analytically and clinically relevant data.

Guidelines for resident training in veterinary clinical pathology. IV: Laboratory quality management-Teaching domains, competencies, and suggested learning outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The 2019 ASVCP Education Committee Forum for Discussion, presented at the annual ASVCP/ACVP meeting, identified a need to develop recommendations for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs. OBJECTIVES: To present a competency-based framework for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs, including entrustable professional activities (EPAs), domains of competence, individual competencies, and learning outcomes. METHODS: A joint subcommittee of the ASVCP Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards (QALS) and Education Committees executed this project. A draft guideline version was reviewed by the ASVCP membership and shared with selected ACVP committees in early 2022, and a final version was voted upon by the full QALS and Education Committees in late 2022. RESULTS: Eleven domains of competence with relevant individual competencies were identified. In addition, suggested learning outcomes and resource lists were developed. Domains and individual competencies were mapped to six EPAs. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline presents a framework for teaching principles of laboratory quality management in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs and was designed to be comprehensive yet practical. Guidance on pedagogical terms and possible routes of implementation are included. Recommendations herein aim to improve and support resident training but may require gradual implementation, as programs phase in necessary expertise and resources. Future directions include the development of learning milestones and assessments and consideration of how recommendations intersect with the American College of Veterinary Pathologists training program accreditation and certifying examination.

Anatomic and clinical pathology services and infrastructure in Zambia.

OBJECTIVES: Pathology services are limited across most of sub-Saharan Africa. We sought to ascertain the availability of anatomic and clinical pathology services and diagnostic resources in Zambia. METHODS: Two individual surveys-one for anatomic pathology and one for clinical pathology/laboratory medicine-were developed by subject matter experts. These surveys were administered to individuals involved in pathology and laboratory medicine diagnostic services at hospitals and laboratories across Zambia from May to October 2022 using the American Society for Clinical Pathology email listserv. RESULTS: A total of 20 responses were received from 17 unique laboratories-8 sites provide anatomic pathology (AP) services, 12 provide clinical pathology (CP) services, and 3 perform both AP and CP services. Anatomic pathology services are variable and generally limited to a few of the responding laboratories, as only 1 laboratory performs immunohistochemical staining on surgical pathology specimens, and only 2 perform general histochemical stains. Conversely, certain microbiology testing (eg, for HIV) is more widely available. CONCLUSIONS: This study of 17 unique laboratories represents the most complete analysis of pathology capabilities in Zambia. Despite initiatives to improve pathology services, both personnel and infrastructure challenges remain. Given a population of approximately 20 million, expansion of anatomic pathology in Zambia must be prioritized.

Assessment of a large language model's utility in helping pathology professionals answer general knowledge pathology questions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility and performance of the large language model ChatGPT 4.0 regarding accuracy, completeness, and its potential as a time-saving tool for pathologists and laboratory directors. METHODS: A deidentified database of questions previously sent to pathology residents from health care providers was used as a source of general knowledge-type pathology questions. These questions were submitted to the large language model and the responses graded by subject matter experts in different pathology subspecialties. The grading criteria assessed accuracy, completeness, and the potential time savings for helping the pathologist craft the response. RESULTS: Overall, respondents thought that most of the answers would take less than 5 minutes of additional work to be used (85%). Accuracy and completeness for the 61 questions was high, with 98% of responses being at least "completely or mostly accurate" and 82% of responses "containing all relevant information." Of the respondents, 97% stated that the response would have "zero or near-zero potential for medical harm," and all thought the tool had potential to save time in constructing answers to health care providers' queries. Performance was similar in both Anatomic Pathology (AP) and Clinical Pathology (CP), with the only exception being some relevant information was excluded in 46% of AP answers vs only 10% in CP (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT version 4.0 gave responses that were predominantly accurate and complete for general knowledge-type pathology questions. With further research and when reviewed by a pathologist or laboratorian, this could facilitate its use as a pathologist's aid in answering questions from health care providers.